The HR role in Performance Management

 

According to Armstrong and Ward (2005) the role of HR is very important in performance management. They are responsible for designing and reviewing systems, convincing boards of new approaches, implementing new processes, conducting workshops for managers and staff, providing advice and support materials to staff and managers, and ensuring compliance. Often, HR takes a more subservient approach, aiming to keep everyone happy by constantly tweaking the system and process according to staff feedback and senior management direction (Armstrong and Ward, 2005).

HR members provide insights, leadership, advice, and services on issues affecting management, employment, learning and development, human rewards and well-being and management, and employee relationships (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014). Every organization wants to have skilled and qualified people to make their organization capable and beneficial, the organization used Performance evaluation to strengthen and motivate people to keep them aligned with the objective (Dessler, 2015). Human resources play a fundamental administrative role in making management easier and more active in influencing management to adopt a more commercial approach to performance management (Armstrong and Ward, 2005). Further, provide information to help managers in their work and decision-making activities to efficiently and effectively achieve the desired organizational goals, acting on the employee’s motivation and the performance assessment (Esposito et al., 2013).

According to Ulrich (1997) HR role focuses on aligning strategies and practices with business strategy. As illustrated in figure 1.0, this delineates four principal HR roles. Those are,

  •          Management of Strategic human resources
  •          Management of firm infrastructure
  •          Management of employee contribution
  •          Management of transformation and change

                      Figure 1.0: Definition of HR Roles

Source: (Ulrich, 1997).


HR Involvement in Performance Management

Performance Planning - An important part of performance planning is aligning individual goals with the organization's strategic objectives (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014). Performance planning should be the first step in setting goals that target what employees want to accomplish over a specific period. This helps employees to understand how they need to allocate time and distribute efforts between special tasks and job engagements, and after the successful implementation of this phase, employees and managers should be well aware of the timeline, expected outcomes, and how progress is measured (Miller, 2018).

Performance Coaching - Coaching is a core performance management activity that takes advantage of opportunities presented by the task itself and uses them to develop knowledge, skills, competencies, and therefore individuals' performance (Armstrong, 2009). The main objective of this step is to provide regular performance feedback throughout the year, providing (Beardwell and Thompson, 2017). Employees will be guided to redesign and tailor the performance they need to focus on. Employees have different levels of characteristics and may need expertise in other fields and skills to work on different tasks. As a result, managers need to understand the different needs of employees and guide them in a way that meets their personal needs (Sharma, 2019).

 Performance Review - The performance review phase includes a formal meeting between the employee and the manager to review their assessment (Aguinis, 2013). Performance review provides a hub for considering key performance and development issues. The performance review meeting is the five basic performance management elements of the agreement, how measurement, feedback, positive reinforcement, and dialogue can be put to good use (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014). Once new strategies for further development are discussed, these new plans should follow the same process as those implemented by HR, which will lead to a fresh start (Rothwell, 2013).

The HR Role of Line Managers

HR can initiate new policies and practices, but line managers have the primary responsibility for implementing them (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014). They are there to get results through people and therefore need to manage the performance of their people (Armstrong, 2009).

Line managers play a crucial role at every stage of the performance management cycle (Armstrong, 2009). At the design and performance agreement stage, they agree with team members on their roles, goals and performance enhancement, and personal development plans. They manage performance throughout the year by monitoring achievements against the plan, feedback, and training as needed. During the review phase, they hold formal review meetings and provide formal feedback as a basis for presenting plans (Armstrong, 2009). As illustrated in figure 2.0, this consists of inhibitors and enablers of HR involvement (Mcguire, Stoner and Mylona, 2008).

                    Figure 2.0: A Framework for Line manager HR Involvement

                  Source: (Mcguire, Stoner and Mylona, 2008).

An example from the company I work for:

The performance work process is leading organizations by advancing corporate objectives by assuring employees should be motivated and improving themself through developing the knowledge, skills, and abilities within the organization under the aligned method. The company I work for is a leading company providing packing solutions in Sri Lanka. We have a separate HR department for performance management and the HR Manager is in charge of its HR activities. Also, HR Executives are available to manage the work. The HR Manager is primarily responsible for documenting, designing, conducting, and allocating required documentation for performance management, with line managers as Production, Finance, Sales, IT, and maintenance managers. Normally, performance assessment doing quarterly and the final result is done annually. The Product Executive, HR Executive, and QA Executive are involved in the quarterly assessment. There, the Human Resources Division provides training and feedback to line managers on the relevant planning as well as how to do it. When doing an annual performance appraisal will conduction the heads of the department of each section.  Finally, during the performance review phase, the HR Division plays a major role in time allocation, location setting, coordination, and overall report submission.

Conclusion:

Performance Management is a crucial and fundamental function of human resource management. It focuses on setting a clear process for managers to follow in order to get the best from their associates. HR’s role is very crucial in performance management when planning, coaching, and reviewing. line managers have the primary responsibility for implementing them.

References:

            Aguinis, H. (2013) Performance Management. 3rd edn. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

       Armstrong, M. (2009) Armstrong's handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance, 4th edn. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

       Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (2014) Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 13th edn. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

            Armstrong, K and Ward, A. (2005) What Makes for Effective Performance Management? The Work Foundation, London.

       Beardwell, J. and Thompson, A. (2017) Human Resource Management: A contemporary approach. 8th edn. New York: Pearson.

       Dessler, G. (2015) Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. 5th edn. London: Pearson.

       Esposito, V., De Nito, E., Iacono, M.P. and Silvestri, L. (2013) Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities: The role of performance management systems. Journal of Intellectual Capital.

       Mcguire, D., Stoner, L. and Mylona, S. (2008) The role of line managers as human resource agents in fostering organizational change in public services. Journal of Change Management8(1), pp.73-84.

       Miller, T. (2018) The new world of human resources and employment: How artificial intelligence and process redesign is driving dramatic change. Business Expert Press.

        Rothwell, W.J. (2013) Performance consulting: Applying performance improvement in human resource development. John Wiley & Sons.

        Sharma, R. (2019) Human Resource Management for Organizational Sustainability. 1st edn. New York: Business Expert Press.

        Ulrich, D. (1996) Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Harvard Business Press.




Comments

  1. according to the Human Resource Management and Performance,( n.d.)First, the HR system serves a strategic role in supporting the effective implementation of the organization's plan by offering the behaviors required to achieve it. Second, the HR system promotes the development of human capital by defining the essential competences necessary to provide the firm with a sustainable competitive advantage based on distinctive assets.
    Reference
    (PDF) Human Resource Management and Performance. (n.d.). ResearchGate. [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229657494_Human_Resource_Management_and_Performance?enrichId=rgreq-97f4d2f2f7c6132c6adbbbf65d92885c-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyOTY1NzQ5NDtBUzo4MjI1MzM4MTczNzI2NzNAMTU3MzExODc1MjM0MQ%3D%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf [Accessed 3 May 2022].

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed with Upul, But The role of HRM is to provide added value to achieve the goals of companies that provide competitive advantage through strategic development (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014)

      Delete
  2. According to Pulakos (2004), managers are reluctant to provide candid feedback and have honest discussions with employees for fear of reprisal or damaging relationships with the very individuals they count on to get work done. Employees feel that their managers are unskilled at discussing their performance and ineffective at coaching them on how to develop their skills. Many complain that performance management systems are cumbersome, bureaucratic and too time consuming for the value added. This leads both managers and employees to treat performance management as a necessary evil of work life that should be minimized rather than an important process that achieves key individual and organizational outcomes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. agreed with you, Naomi. As Holpp (2011) identified, some employees may feel discouraged, impassioned, and unsympathetic about negative assessments, especially if they disagree with the content of the criticism and believe they are doing a proper job. In this case, employees may have no reason to change their future behavior and believe that the current level of performance is acceptable.

      Delete
  3. Yes, Hasara. But there should be a balance in studying the relationship between HRM and performance in the sense that financial performance and the role and contribution of employees should be the basis of performance indicators (Mutua, Karanja and Namusonge, 2013).

    ReplyDelete
  4. In order to give organizations a better chance of reaping the full benefits of performance management, the strategic performance management development cycle has been developed.(de Waal, 2007).
    The strategic performance cycle consists of (1) Strategic management model (2) Strategic reporting model (3) Performance driven behavioral model.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Amal. Many employers or managers now view performance management as a continuum of activities that link an organization's culture, business goals, and strategies to individual performance and contribution ( Mattone, 2013).

      Delete
  5. The importance of the performance appraisal systems depends on the nature of the relevant business environment, which is set up according to the organizational (Idowu, 2017).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, Harshani. And also Idowu (2017) stated that performance appraisal systems should be built in such a way that they foster impressions of fair treatment in comparison to other workers, as well as the expectation of the employee.

      Delete
  6. Here I can completely agreed what you have pointed out based on Armstrong (2014, p.391) define Performance Management as “A systematic process for improving individual, team and organizational performance” and “The continuous process of improving performance by setting individual teams and goals which are aligned to the strategic goals of the organization, planning performance to achieve the goals, reviewing progress, and developing the knowledge, skills and abilities of the people”

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

360-Degree Feedback

Methods of Employee Performance Evaluation

Employee Performance Evaluation